Dimo
Horizontal Analysis for
Income Statement
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
2012
|
|
Rs. \000
|
Rs. \000
|
Rs. \000
|
Rs. \000
|
Rs. \000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
35,403,232
|
26,179,115
|
19,185,246
|
26,496,949
|
|
-8.94%
|
-32.66%
|
-50.65%
|
-31.84%
|
100%
|
|
|
Sales taxes
|
208,378
|
218,412
|
180,872
|
216,789
|
305,139
|
|
-31.71%
|
-28.42%
|
-40.72%
|
-28.95%
|
100%
|
|
Net revenue
|
35,194,854
|
25,960,703
|
19,004,374
|
26,280,160
|
38,572,283
|
|
-8.76%
|
-32.70%
|
-50.73%
|
-31.87%
|
100%
|
|
Cost of sales
|
29,408,729
|
21,417,468
|
15,226,149
|
22,519,305
|
31,758,534
|
|
-7.40%
|
-32.56%
|
-52.06%
|
-29.09%
|
100%
|
|
Gross profit
|
5,786,125
|
4,543,235
|
3,778,225
|
3,760,855
|
6,813,749
|
|
-15.08%
|
-33.32%
|
-44.55%
|
-44.80%
|
100%
|
|
Other operating income
|
103,147
|
63,480
|
69,722
|
35,427
|
23,915
|
|
331.31%
|
165.44%
|
191.54%
|
48.14%
|
100%
|
|
Distribution expenses
|
994,715
|
561,206
|
506,403
|
475,939
|
641,599
|
|
55.04%
|
-12.53%
|
-21.07%
|
-25.82%
|
100%
|
|
Administrative expenses
|
3,529,057
|
2,986,459
|
2,658,182
|
2,599,142
|
2,335,213
|
|
51.12%
|
27.89%
|
13.83%
|
11.30%
|
100%
|
|
Operating profit
|
1,365,500
|
1,059,050
|
683,362
|
721,201
|
3,813,022
|
|
-64.19%
|
-72.23%
|
-82.08%
|
-81.09%
|
100%
|
|
Finance income
|
194,578
|
106,730
|
70,617
|
241,178
|
179,653
|
|
8.31%
|
-40.59%
|
-60.69%
|
34.25%
|
100%
|
|
Finance costs
|
468,036
|
415,462
|
423,990
|
630,798
|
447,553
|
|
4.58%
|
-7.17%
|
-5.26%
|
40.94%
|
100%
|
|
Net finance costs
|
273,458
|
308,732
|
353,373
|
389,620
|
267,900
|
|
2.07%
|
15.24%
|
31.90%
|
45.43%
|
100%
|
|
Profit before tax
|
1,092,042
|
750,318
|
329,989
|
331,581
|
3,545,122
|
|
-69.20%
|
-78.84%
|
-90.69%
|
-90.65%
|
100%
|
|
Income tax expense
|
352,319
|
203,757
|
50,070
|
20,243
|
971,221
|
|
-63.72%
|
-79.02%
|
-94.84%
|
-97.92%
|
100%
|
|
Profit for the year
|
739,723
|
546,561
|
279,919
|
351,824
|
2,573,901
|
|
-71.26%
|
-78.77%
|
-89.12%
|
-86.33%
|
100%
|
According
to above analysis, it indicates that the most of the figures are negative
values. Therefore, the profit of the company has not increased with the
increment of the asset of the company. It point out that even the company
assets were increased the company has not productively managed the assets to
increase the profit of the company.
Z Score Formula
The
Z score is use to predict the likelihood that a business will go bankrupt
within the next two years. The formula based on information found in the income
statement and balance sheet of an organization; as such, it can be readily
derivefrom commonly available information. Given the ease with which the
required information can be find, the Z score is useful metric for an outsider
who has access to a company's financial statements.
The
Z score formula is as follows:
Z
= 1.2T1 + 1.4T2 + 3.3T3 + 0.6T4 + 0.99T5
T1
= Working capital / Total assets
T2
= Retained earnings / Total assets
T3
= Earnings before interest and taxes / Total assets
T4
= Market value of equity / Book value of total liabilities
T5
= Total sales / Total assets
|
|
Working capital
|
Total assets
|
Retained earnings
|
Earnings before
interest and taxes |
Market value of equity
|
Book value of
total liabilities |
Sales
|
|
2012
|
3421640
|
14,740,119
|
2,707,993
|
3,516,177
|
0.841027994
|
0.87304
|
38,877,422
|
|
2013
|
2444707
|
12,285,246
|
1,369,850
|
331,581
|
0.859710602
|
0.57951
|
26,496,949
|
|
2014
|
2393231
|
15,402,774
|
1,356,431
|
329,989
|
0.891967464
|
0.91111
|
19,185,246
|
|
2015
|
2315231
|
17,083,766
|
1,631,457
|
750,318
|
1.040725913
|
0.95711
|
26,179,115
|
|
2016
|
2830031
|
19,253,328
|
2,107,736
|
1,092,042
|
1.125415412
|
1.13997
|
35,403,232
|
|
|
T1
|
T2
|
T3
|
T4
|
T5
|
Z Score
|
|
|
2012
|
0.232131097
|
0.183715817
|
0.238544682
|
0.96333465
|
2.637524297
|
4.512106755
|
|
|
2013
|
0.198995364
|
0.111503669
|
0.02699018
|
1.483515857
|
2.156810617
|
3.509319191
|
|
|
2014
|
0.155376622
|
0.088064072
|
0.021423998
|
0.978989936
|
1.24557083
|
2.200949925
|
|
|
2015
|
0.135522285
|
0.095497503
|
0.043919941
|
1.087359531
|
1.532397189
|
2.610747989
|
|
|
2016
|
0.146989185
|
0.109473853
|
0.056719649
|
0.987229544
|
1.838811036
|
2.929585909
|
Z > 2.99
-
“Safe” zone
1.8 < Z < 2.99 -
“Grey” zone
Z<1.80
-
“Distress” zone
Considering above calculations we can specify that the company in
safe zone. However, there were cases in 2014 and 2015, the company has entered
in to the grey zone, but eventually it has come in to the safe zone. Therefore,
the company is safe to continue its business.